• Home
  • Buy
  • Author
  • Press
  • Video
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Cover Images
Eric is Awake

The Anonymous Citizen

Notes from a fleshy tube of chemicals in UK Inc.

Go Buy an Eric

The Art of the Impossible

9/22/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
The current split between Russia and the US on Syria is merely the latest manifestation of the personal compromise politicians make when they enter ‘the art of the possible’ and enter into the conspiracy of diplomacy and rhetoric that suppresses the fact that the notion is simply an artifice.

The phrase belonged to Otto von Bismarck, the First Chancellor to Wilhelm 1 of Prussia. Bismarck played the game of Machiavellian politics to the nth degree, his aggressive history revealing the uber-reapolitik politician as a contradictory character. Ruthless and conservative with an innate disdain for democracy, he also established the beginning of the world’s first welfare state, seeing practical pragmatic reasons to bolster economic growth by giving workers security.  

Although the man who believed in ‘blood and iron’ rather than speeches and majority decisions would find nothing unfamiliar with the face-off over intervention in a bloody civil war, he would probably be perplexed by the principled facades of Putin and John Kerry, trumpeting their arguments as if motivated by the dead children pulled from the dusty rubble of bombed Syrian districts or the bloody cul-de-sacs of military marshlands like Iraq or Afghanistan and not by the Cold War by any other name that they have continued to wage from the familiar entrenchments of East and West.

There is a refreshing honesty to Bismarck’s approach in retrospect, however appalling some of the ideas he espoused about the rule of the Junkers or landed aristocracy over the puppet elected officials of Government. His first principle was ‘does it meet the aims of the Empire?’ If not, then he was against it and would use military might or oppose its use equally passionately without feeling the need to paint the action as a ‘mission to fight tyranny’ or ‘defend the victims of oppression.’ For him, it was a pragmatic, amoral action motivated entirely by the self -interest first of the Prussian Empire and then of the nascent German state. In 1888 he spoke against the possibility of a European war over Bulgaria in tones that seem all too familiar, opposing ‘a war whose issue no man can foresee. At the end of the conflict we should scarcely know why we had fought.’

Realpolitik, both the word and the principle, was conceived in an age before public relations. Nowadays the blood and iron, even in the face of blank opposition from your own population, must be coated in the sheen of principle, however implausible or hypocritical. The seasoned diplomat clings to their hypocrisy as the only thing that distinguishes us from animals. To them, it shows our capacity for the artful avoidance of morality, even if we have the capacity for it and revels in the sophistry.

Putin is against the US taking action outside of the UN because he loses his veto and therefore his share of the game. Obama and Kerry dress up ignoring the UN option and literally soldiering on as a necessity, despite widespread opposition by those stung by the Iraqi morass, by grandstanding in particular on the specific red line of sarin gas.

Undeniably cruel and inhumane, chemical warfare and its definition under the Chemical Weapons Convention has also been slanted in the direction of post-WWII politics. The few most noted breaches of the convention are the gassing of the Kurds by Saddam at Halabja, the release of sarin gas in Japan by the Aum Shinrikyo cult and the most recent example in Syria.

This seems counter-intuitive if you think of chemical warfare in the round. Really? Only a few examples of such breaches since the Convention emerged? Does that seem possible or probable? What about Agent Orange in Vietnam? The white phosphorus that was used by the US in Iraq and the Israelis in the Occupied Territories? Plenty of charred children there to rail against and yet Schedule 1 of the Chemical Weapons Convention specifies ‘chemicals that have few or no uses outside of chemical weapons.’ It doesn’t say you can’t have them. You can legitimately test chemical weapons or use them for unspecified medical research. If you aren’t permitted to use them, why test them? What are you testing them for? Moisturiser?

Schedule 2 specifies chemicals that have ‘legitimate small-scale applications’ which must be declared but are only subject to restrictions to those countries that are not signatories. Take note all those nations who wish to use mustard type gases. Sign up to the CWC and you can get away with no restrictions on substances also used to fill up your average ink cartridge.

Schedule 3 is a doozy and may explain why there have been so few technical breaches of the CWC. This covers chemicals that ‘have large-scale uses apart from chemical weapons.’ In other words, the possessions of white phosphorus or defoliants like Napalm are all permitted to be stockpiled in quantities up to 30 tons by any signatory nation. Hence the lack of any real sanctions against their use in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Iraq or Gaza.

But even here, the self-interest is merely the sub-text of a diversionary debate about the contents of each nation’s chemistry set. As usual it will be easy to find Syria’s chemical weapons inventory by simply locating the receipts in the defence departments of those apparently willing to intervene. The trade in chemical weapons by the US and UK in particular but also by Russia, has not been impeded by the Chemical Weapons Convention. It is obvious that victims of a bombing campaign die of conventional weapons in far greater numbers than they do from chemical weapons. But the convention, cobbled together in the spirit of preserving the chemical option by every signatory nation who turned up to the first meeting, is just the latest tool in a political game that sees the old Cold War divisions cloaked in a semblance of principle.  

No one denies the tragedy and injustice of non-combatants, particularly children becoming, along with truth, the first casualties of war. But there is the familiar stench of realpolitik about the Chemical Weapons Convention’s role in the present debate over Syria and it reeks of blood and iron. 


0 Comments



Leave a Reply.


    AuthorBot

    Dom Shaw is the author of 'Eric is Awake' and also a fleshy tube of chemicals working as a writer, scriptwriter and filmmaker in the UK. Was a boy, now a man. He lives.  

    Archives

    May 2020
    March 2019
    August 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    Categories

    All
    All The Years Of Trying
    Ana Mendieta Carl Andre Cliched Conversations Tate Gallery Quentin Crisp Modern Art Rome Stephen Geller
    Anti-apartheid Chris De Broglio Portman Court Hotel Breyten Breytenbach South Africa Sport Peter Hain Arthur Ashe Muhammad Ali
    Bradley Manning Hacktivists Ancient Rome Standing On Your Head Monetise
    Celebrities St James's Park Angelina Jolie Brad Pitt Heron Pelicans Russell Crowe Squirrels Entertainment Industry Paparazzi
    Chemical Weapons Convention Syria Obama John Kerry Putin Bismarck Realpolitik Germany Prussia Gas Russia Us
    Coronavirus
    Depression
    Drugs Legalisation Herion Nhs Mike Barton Durham Police Chief Transform Drug Policy Foundation
    General Alexander James Clapper Nsa Gchq Mi5 Samuel Johnson Patriotism Gchq Math Orwellian Arithmetic Patriot Act Usa Uk Special Relationship
    George Orwell Isle Of Jura Barnhill 1984 Eric Blair Awake
    Iran Nowruz Huac Zero Mostel Mi5 Gchq
    Juvenal Fourth Estate David Miranda Glenn Greenwald Yochai Benkler Brendan O'neill Guardian Newspaper Hacking Scandal Leveson Fleet Street
    Lockdown
    Miranda Censorship Journalism Snowden Milton Areopagitica Orwell Prention Of Literature Soviet Putin Bulgakov
    Mitt Romney Bain Capital Seamus Dog
    Nelson Mandela ANC Ruth First Church Street Bombing Ghandi Non-violence Umkhonto We Sizwe
    Nsa Mi5 Snowden Bletchley Park Surveillance Roman Empire Pax Romana
    Olympics Queen Sun City Mandela Apartheid Sports Boycott Stephen Fry Sebastian Coe Joe Ebrahim South Africa Dennis Brutus Tommie Smith John Carlos
    Orwell 1984 Brighton Writers Group Novel Us Tv
    Orwell 1984 Surveillance Nsa
    Panasonic AJ-HPX3700 Gorilla David Attenborough Wildlife Cameraman
    Patrik Fitzgerald Punk Poet Bob Geldof Boomtown Rats Roundhouse London Benjamin Zephaniah Everett True Rough Cut And Ready Dubbed
    Porlock Samuel Taylor Coleridge Inspiration Ideas Writers
    Public Sector Nhs Privatise Bbc John Birt Corpritization
    Red Things Rough Cut And Ready Dubbed Art Of The Critic Eric Is Awake Richard Dreyfus Close Encounters
    Retrospective Diagnosis Mentally Ill Lithium Orwell Christopher Hitchens Aspergers Fox Network Socialist
    Russell Brand Revolution Voting Is Dead Democracy Chartists Orwell Yeats Awake
    Russian Revolution Harry Young Lenin Comintern Bukharin Zinoviev Young Communist League Uk Cockney Commissar
    Scriptwriting
    Snowden Privacy Electronic Frontier Foundation Tor Network Reset The Net Julius Caesar Cryptography Encryption Mi5 Nsa Gchq Hello Kitty Google Metadata Intrusion
    Thoreau Walden Living Off The Grid Society Drop Out Self-sufficiency Nuisance Abatement Survivalists Living Off The Land
    Tony Blair David Cameron Syria War History Falklands Bosnia
    Tracey Emin Ivan Massow Conceptual Art Ica Critics Comedy Film
    Writing

    RSS Feed