• Home
  • Buy
  • Author
  • Press
  • Video
  • Blog
  • Links
  • Cover Images
Eric is Awake

The Anonymous Citizen

Notes from a fleshy tube of chemicals in UK Inc.

Go Buy an Eric

Can We Really Be Bothered To Take Back Our Privacy?

8/18/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture
Speaking via Google Hangouts from Russia on June 5th 2014, during a talk with Electronic Frontier Foundation co-founder J.P. Barlow at the Personal Democracy Forum conference in New York City, Edward Snowden was all about the good news for what he likes to call ‘netizens’. That’s what we are now, you and I, ‘netizens’. Just using the greatest step forward in communication since Alexander Graham Bell was first put on hold, makes it so.

The advice and the watchword from Snowden and the Electronic Frontier Foundation are all about a discipline that first saw military use in the era of Julius Caesar - Cryptography.  The putative Emperor God favoured a standard substitution cipher to communicate with his generals which was considered quite innovative at the time and really boosted his capacity to outwit the enemy. But we all know what happened to Julius. An audacious rise up the ranks through judicious military strategy and a risible comb-over period before succumbing to hubris and failing to kick against the pricks of his rivals who stabbed him near the Theatre of Pompey (very sensitive area to be punctured) thus qualifying him as the very first post-mortem report. Apparently his death was mostly attributable to blood loss from multiple stab wounds. I like that ‘mostly’. As if his hay fever also played a major part in his demise. JFK’s fate was probably mostly down to his lactose intolerance.

The modern interpretation of cryptography of course is encryption.  The way we take back our privacy is apparently by obfuscating everything we do online. The Reset the Net campaigners freely admit all they are doing is promoting consumer encryption tools that make NSA surveillance harder and more expensive. Therefore, contrary to the conference strap line, you are not taking back your privacy; you are simply putting a price on it, forcing spooks to do a cost benefit analysis on breaking your codes.

Reset the Net has a privacy pack that is designed to slow the NSA and GCHQ down to a slow muddy trudge through your privacy rather than a joyful gambol through the open fields of your Facebook statuses and your online purchases from ‘Iamnotaspy.com.’

On your mobile, you are advised to download Chatsecure, Textsecure, Redphone and Cryptocat from…the Google Play store, respected guardians of your privacy with no record at all of compromising your data. Thunderbird and Enigmail will encrypt your email if you download them from Mozilla. It may also be possible to use Universal Encryption Managers from almost a thousand providers.

The Tor Network is recommended and before you download it, be sure to read their latest top security advisory about a ‘relay early’ traffic confirmation attack. Apparently, and who knew this could happen, unknown persons who probably thought the metadata of folks who use the Tor Network might be worthy of more attention than you naïve felons and cyber activists who use Firefox or Chrome, decided to make a special effort to find out what you were so all fired up to protect.

And here is where the real cost benefit analysis takes place on a purely personal level. Let us assume for a moment that the recommended browsers and software are not compromised by special teams of code monkeys set up to focus on them by virtue of their ubiquity amongst users who wish to conceal their data. Let us also assume that the authors of these instruments are not seduced into the ranks of GCHQ and the NSA or Chinese State Security to lead them by the hand through the back door portals of their arcane mysteries. Let us assume your eyelids are not already growing heavy at the thought of all that software downloading and round the back technology you are going to have to master in order to keep track of what the trackers are not keeping track of. Let us assume you give a flying cleft stick (early cryptography) about protecting your state-shaking hacktivism from detection.

Most of you are not doing that sort of thing. You are, in the main, and purely by statistical probability, not a member of Anonymous, not a paedophile, not a criminal laundering your drugs proceeds through a Cayman Island shell company operated by a Limited Liability Partnership through the UK where the Government has made it so very easy to hide your ill-gotten gains. Therefore, all this activity of camouflage and misdirection is all about a principle.

‘They shall not have my data, even if that data is mind-numbingly boring and mundane and nobody cares if I also bought ‘Gone Girl’ after the ‘The Anarchist Cookbook’.’

A noble and principled stand. There may well be some satisfaction in making yourself a target for more attention from those trawling the metadata only for them to discover that you are kinky for ‘Hello Kitty’ underwear and that you buy every Jo Nesbo novel, the second it becomes available.  But frankly, it just makes most of us tired at the very thought.

Part of me wants to stand up for the principle, knowing it is already a lost cause. But the other part of me, the part that really wants to get to the shops before I have to go to work again, simply despairs at the low ambition of such measures. It’s a pretty miserable level of attainment to know that all your efforts to anonymise your every action are only slowing up the process. That every vote to restrict the routine surveillance of every ‘netizen’ is always subverted by the gatekeepers of the latest technology, whatever quasi-democratic decision is made in the heavily bugged corridors of power. That, in the end, it is just too much effort to be anonymous and that the quid pro quo of using these bastard child technologies of Mr A G Bell Esq. is the absolute abandonment of privacy and the monetisation of your every online action.

We acquiesce through apathy and I really do understand how equally miserable a response that is. I’d really like to justify it by suggesting we all just give up trying and accept that we should never do anything online at all that we do not wish to be susceptible to snooping. That we should, like certain Russian intelligence oligarchs, revert to cash only transactions, Adler typewriters and dead letter drops in the park, even if all we are concealing is our dirty laundry bags with those ‘Hello Kitty’ drawers right at the bottom where no one can see. But I just can’t be bothered.



1 Comment
Chad's Personal Blog link
7/5/2023 12:10:00 am

Hello maate nice blog

Reply



Leave a Reply.


    AuthorBot

    Dom Shaw is the author of 'Eric is Awake' and also a fleshy tube of chemicals working as a writer, scriptwriter and filmmaker in the UK. Was a boy, now a man. He lives.  

    Archives

    January 2024
    May 2020
    March 2019
    August 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    Categories

    All
    All The Years Of Trying
    Ana Mendieta Carl Andre Cliched Conversations Tate Gallery Quentin Crisp Modern Art Rome Stephen Geller
    Anti-apartheid Chris De Broglio Portman Court Hotel Breyten Breytenbach South Africa Sport Peter Hain Arthur Ashe Muhammad Ali
    Bradley Manning Hacktivists Ancient Rome Standing On Your Head Monetise
    Cabal
    Celebrities St James's Park Angelina Jolie Brad Pitt Heron Pelicans Russell Crowe Squirrels Entertainment Industry Paparazzi
    Chemical Weapons Convention Syria Obama John Kerry Putin Bismarck Realpolitik Germany Prussia Gas Russia Us
    CIA
    Comey
    Coronavirus
    Deep State
    Depression
    Drugs Legalisation Herion Nhs Mike Barton Durham Police Chief Transform Drug Policy Foundation
    FBI
    General Alexander James Clapper Nsa Gchq Mi5 Samuel Johnson Patriotism Gchq Math Orwellian Arithmetic Patriot Act Usa Uk Special Relationship
    George Orwell Isle Of Jura Barnhill 1984 Eric Blair Awake
    Harold Wilson
    Insurrection
    Iran Nowruz Huac Zero Mostel Mi5 Gchq
    Juvenal Fourth Estate David Miranda Glenn Greenwald Yochai Benkler Brendan O'neill Guardian Newspaper Hacking Scandal Leveson Fleet Street
    Lockdown
    MI5
    Miranda Censorship Journalism Snowden Milton Areopagitica Orwell Prention Of Literature Soviet Putin Bulgakov
    Mitt Romney Bain Capital Seamus Dog
    Nelson Mandela ANC Ruth First Church Street Bombing Ghandi Non-violence Umkhonto We Sizwe
    Nsa Mi5 Snowden Bletchley Park Surveillance Roman Empire Pax Romana
    Olympics Queen Sun City Mandela Apartheid Sports Boycott Stephen Fry Sebastian Coe Joe Ebrahim South Africa Dennis Brutus Tommie Smith John Carlos
    Orwell 1984 Brighton Writers Group Novel Us Tv
    Orwell 1984 Surveillance Nsa
    Panasonic AJ-HPX3700 Gorilla David Attenborough Wildlife Cameraman
    Patrik Fitzgerald Punk Poet Bob Geldof Boomtown Rats Roundhouse London Benjamin Zephaniah Everett True Rough Cut And Ready Dubbed
    Peter Wright
    Porlock Samuel Taylor Coleridge Inspiration Ideas Writers
    Public Sector Nhs Privatise Bbc John Birt Corpritization
    Red Things Rough Cut And Ready Dubbed Art Of The Critic Eric Is Awake Richard Dreyfus Close Encounters
    Retrospective Diagnosis Mentally Ill Lithium Orwell Christopher Hitchens Aspergers Fox Network Socialist
    Russell Brand Revolution Voting Is Dead Democracy Chartists Orwell Yeats Awake
    Russian Revolution Harry Young Lenin Comintern Bukharin Zinoviev Young Communist League Uk Cockney Commissar
    Scriptwriting
    Sedition
    Snowden Privacy Electronic Frontier Foundation Tor Network Reset The Net Julius Caesar Cryptography Encryption Mi5 Nsa Gchq Hello Kitty Google Metadata Intrusion
    Thoreau Walden Living Off The Grid Society Drop Out Self-sufficiency Nuisance Abatement Survivalists Living Off The Land
    Tony Blair David Cameron Syria War History Falklands Bosnia
    Tracey Emin Ivan Massow Conceptual Art Ica Critics Comedy Film
    Trump
    Writing

    RSS Feed